Pages

Followers

Thursday, May 20, 2010

I wont go there

Stereotyping is just an extension of the power of fears…well we stereotype when we want to ease our fears. I guess it’s sometimes alright because it brings around conformity of a good kind, but often breeds conformity of the bad kind.

In the apartheid government we were stereotyped by classing us according to race. If you had a lighter colour skin you were more important than if you had a darker colour skin.  As absurd as it sounds, propaganda played on people’s fears that they were/ would become lesser beings if they associated vertically down the food chain and so the story goes on.

In the freed society we live in our fears and most definitely mine still linger on this subject of “my worth”. Society has historically been classified as rich and poor; this is geographically true as well as embedded in our thinking. We have developed a society that yearns money and in doing so have idolised the previously disadvantaged that have managed to make money quickly. The “black diamond’s” seems to be what all working class “black” people aim to become. The “Indian” people have been revered for their ability to make wealth. When people see young Indian kids in smart cars, they simply assume that their families are rich. White people are known as the previously advantaged and South Africans expect them to already have everything.  The classifications and assumptions and expectations developed through the years have made us weary of being different lest someone questions us. We think as we have been taught to, we act as we have been taught to, we interact as we are taught to and if we do anything that’s not “as expected” we bashfully turn defensive.

There’s a place in South Africa called Laudium. For me, and I guess many others, it represents the most flippant contrast between the haves and the have-nots. Poor people living in squalid conditions juxtaposed by the most magnificent homes and the largest concentration of a certain brand of luxury vehicles in the world.
I have only ever visited this place twice; both times out of necessity but with a sense of curiosity aswell. I had heard of Laudium residents and their mansions.

 The residents of Laudium are mostly “Indian” having been moved there under the group areas act ages ago.  I had previously accepted that the expectations that non-indian people had of me being rich and owning many vehicles and buying my way through school stemmed from nothing other than the business mindedness that “Indian” people are known for. Indians were known for their enterprising nature to sustain themselves. In the past, bribes were made to make lives easier (not condoned).  Everything had some explanation. Then… I encountered Laudium in the day time! I saw the palaces, the  pomp and pride called Laudium (ironically pronounced Lord –ium) crusted by  the Itireleng informal settlement.

I don’t understand; I couldn’t interpret, I still can’t begin to imagine how this happened. My eye’s dilated, my jaw dropped and I took a deep breath. Whatever happened to loving thy neighbour? Wait a second, am I like this? My mind started racing through all the remarks I had ever heard. Rationality failed me…the questions wouldn’t stop
  • ·         Do I live in a fort while my neighbour huddles under a tree unable to keep a roof over his head?
  • Do I live expensively at the cost of others?
  •  Do I drive flashy cars and flash my money to escape unsavoury situations?

Laudium represents even more of a parody to me. I have developed a fear of being classified “Indian” but in the process I am stereotyping the “Indian” whose values I disprove of. My visit to the little town was a colossal shock to my system. I won’t go there again, if not just because visually it imparts such dementia but also because my fear of interacting with Laudiumers may ignite a deep seated ugliness in me. 

What would you do?

Sunday, March 21, 2010

a world designed and operated by men

I wonder if the engineering world was designed to keep women out. It sure seems like it !

When I was at varsity I couldn't say out loud what class I was late for or what assignment I had outstanding or even what exam I had to study for...not to my non-engineering friends. My subject list always invoked a discussion on the perversity of engineers. I didn't blame the "others", with subjects like vibrations, fluids and heat transfer along with study topics like contact stresses I was always the butt of a joke or 2 if i happened to mention anything.

It is no better in practical engineering situations. It makes me wonder what inspired this type of terminology. Surely there was a better way of labeling!

to put you in the picture here's just a few examples:

Engineers ,not the HIV/AIDS activists that promote the use on condoms, coined the term "safety first"
we're all acquainted with the nut and bolt stories ...i wont go there!
there's also pipe fittings which are referred to as male and female ( and they try to act innocent about the naming )
I recently had a project where the technician kept on referring to a nipple. Can you just imagine how uncomfortable that made me feel?
engines will be "serviced"
pipes will be cleaned
coupling is necessary for flow through pipes and for trains ...to make it bigger!
Civil engineers all believe "bigger is better"!
Lubrication is the order of the day...theses a whole subject on it called tribology
there's a flow theory in fluid dynamics called "separation" and a graph which describes an engineering phenomenon which is referred to as the bathtub curve, this no doubt sets their minds into some other dreamy world

talking about dreamy world...I think that many of my male counterparts and their predecessors could be described as social rejects. They don't know how to approach a lady (or any other form that may be attracted to) because of their technical minds(maybe this is an excuse) so they vent the frustration in their work and in this case through their work. I think they even do it sub-consciously.

My point tho' is that the engineering world draws the most parallels to "the Flintstones". Its archaic , but as advanced as the immediate world would like to believe it is . Men created this world, I think its being in development since the invention on the wheel.

Ladies ( and I refer to the elite here) in Europe in the time of the industrial were so misled. While their men displayed the best of the best of chivalric practice, he was amusing himself by inventing a males only society in the engineering field. "The chivalric code places an extremely rigorous standard of conduct on anyone who lives by it. To achieve it completely takes almost super-human qualities. One is expected to fiercely protect the honor of his liege, his love, and himself while remaining totally without pride. " I guess it could be these super-human qualities that "he" could not live up to.

What if the ladies designed engineering? Would it be just as perverse?